Jury Decision Dashboard — Sign in to track your decisions
or
Upload a photoJPG, PNG — max 2 MB
or
Jury Decision Dashboard — Sign in to track your decisions
A quick walkthrough to keep your review flow seamless.
Selection Bootcamp. March 5 & 6, 26' · Ben Guerir
| Project | Select | Maybe | Pass | Total | Comments |
|---|
| Updated | Jury | Project | Decision | Comment |
|---|
| Time | Action | Jury | Project | Decision | Comment |
|---|
Scoring, confidence, and ranking information is hidden during jury review. Enter the passcode to unlock this page.
Incorrect passcode.
This dashboard employs a multi-dimensional scoring framework designed to approximate the due diligence process of a top-tier venture capital investor. Every project is evaluated through a dual-lens system: an Investment Score (0–100) reflecting overall venture quality, and a Confidence Rating (0–100) measuring the reliability of the assessment based on information availability.
The Investment Score is a weighted composite of six key dimensions that institutional investors use when screening early-stage ventures:
TAM size, CAGR, competitive intensity, timing. Markets with $1B+ TAM and 15%+ CAGR score highest.
Novelty, defensibility (IP), TRL level, step-change vs. incremental improvement.
Revenue model clarity, unit economics, scalability, path to profitability.
SDG alignment, climate resilience, food security, financial inclusion, healthcare access.
Domain expertise, value proposition articulation, hypothesis specificity.
Differentiation, barriers to entry, first-mover advantage in target geography.
The Confidence Rating measures assessment reliability based on data quality and completeness. It is NOT a measure of project quality.
Rich data. Original market data, clear tech description, verifiable claims.
Good info but gaps. Interpolated market data. Key assumptions need validation.
Limited data. Generated market sizing. Unclear tech approach. Significant DD required.
Minimal info. Largely speculative assessment. Full DD required before any decision.
| Band | Label | Criteria | Recommended Action |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | Shortlist | Top ~25% by combined score and confidence | Highest-priority projects for jury selection discussion. |
| B | Maybe | Next ~35% by combined score and confidence | Strong projects with open points for calibration by the jury. |
| C | Shortlist for Another Cohort | Next ~25% by combined score and confidence | Potential projects to revisit for a future intake. |
| D | Monitor | Bottom ~15% by combined score and confidence | Monitor for progress before reconsideration. |
Click a selector to filter boxes by band. Bands are assigned from combined score and confidence ranking.
Mordor Intelligence, Grand View Research, Statista, McKinsey for TAM, CAGR, and competitive landscape.
Partech Africa, GSMA, AfDB, World Bank data on funding flows, fintech adoption, and sectoral trends.
Morocco's NDC climate targets, Green Generation strategy, AfCFTA protocols, national energy/agriculture policies.
ScienceDirect, ResearchGate for TRL assessment, efficacy validation, and innovation benchmarking.
Data as of February 2026. Market figures are directional estimates. This screening tool informs jury deliberation — it does not constitute investment advice.
Each box below uses the analyst assessment built from the research sources listed above (industry reports, databases, policy, and scientific literature).
This section summarizes the pre-bootcamp startup submissions. Focus is on execution readiness: GTM clarity, proof of demand, unit economics, and pilot feasibility.
Strong concentration in Agri/Food/Climate, with a smaller set in AI/Digital and Health. The strongest gap across teams is commercial evidence (paid pilot, conversion, unit economics) rather than idea quality.
Before final jury selection, each team should provide: one signed pilot/LOI, a 12-month milestone plan, base unit economics (CAC, margin, payback), and one quantified traction metric.
Strength: Clear precision-fertilization pain point and practical field hardware proposition.
Risk: Equipment reliability and servicing in rural operations.
Bootcamp focus: Pilot ROI proof with cooperatives, pricing model (sale vs leasing), maintenance plan.
Strength: Import substitution thesis with direct industrial relevance.
Risk: Certification timeline and quality consistency at scale.
Bootcamp focus: ISO/AWS roadmap, first industrial LOIs, landed cost benchmark vs imports.
Strength: Relevant urban/climate use case potential.
Risk: Scope may be too broad without one sharp entry point.
Bootcamp focus: Single priority use case, named buyer, KPI-linked pilot design.
Strength: Solves mechanization access bottleneck with USSD + app fit for terrain realities.
Risk: Marketplace operations quality (availability, disputes, reliability).
Bootcamp focus: Dispatch logic, service SLA, booking-to-service conversion metrics.
Strength: High-value on-site diagnostics for faster agronomic decisions.
Risk: Sensor credibility versus lab-grade testing.
Bootcamp focus: Validation protocol (lab comparison), acceptable error thresholds, advisor adoption.
Strength: Clear digitization need for gym operators and member discovery.
Risk: Fragmented market and price sensitivity.
Bootcamp focus: Narrow B2B wedge first (operator tooling), retention KPI, paid onboarding funnel.
Strength: Sports-tech narrative aligned with performance analytics trends.
Risk: Niche segment and long institutional sales cycles.
Bootcamp focus: Clear payer persona, measurable performance KPI, partner club pilot.
Strength: Inclusive fractional real-estate access with ethics/compliance positioning.
Risk: Regulatory and trust-heavy onboarding requirements.
Bootcamp focus: Legal structure clarity, KYC/AML flow, investor protection framework.
Strength: Nutrition + climate resilience + smallholder sourcing story is compelling.
Risk: Processing scale-up and route-to-market discipline.
Bootcamp focus: Hero SKU economics, quality consistency, distribution channel margin test.
Strength: Practical disease-detection + agronomist support use case.
Risk: Diagnostic model precision and recommendation reliability.
Bootcamp focus: Local disease dataset quality, precision/recall targets, advisory workflow.
Strength: Strong accounting workflow pain and timely compliance tailwind.
Risk: OCR/IDP reliability and deep software integrations.
Bootcamp focus: One fully integrated cabinet pilot, time-saved metric, error-rate benchmark.
Strength: Meaningful healthcare digitization ambition across value chain roles.
Risk: Product scope fragmentation across multiple modules.
Bootcamp focus: Prioritize one core module, define ICP, prove repeatable activation metric.
Strength: Circular model (waste to mushrooms to biofertilizer) with clear ESG relevance.
Risk: Operational consistency, food-grade quality control, and demand certainty.
Bootcamp focus: Offtake commitments, yield/unit economics, QA and compliance controls.